Tool review
Catrobat
Our first full write-up under this method: the block-based, open-source engine behind Pocket Code.
Read moreTool hub
Tool and course comparison
A growing, method-first comparison of programming tools and courses for children and teenagers. Every entry states what we checked, what we did not, and why there is no single winner.
What we have compared so far
Tool review
Scratch
The one most teachers and parents meet first, and the tool Pocket Code was inspired by. Browser-based, which means it inherits every dependency a school network has.
Read more
Tool review
Godot
The odd one out here: a real game engine, not a beginner tool. The useful review is an honest answer to who should not use it.
Read more
Archive
Pocket Code
The mobile app itself, free and open source, and the project history that produced it.
Read more
Archive
Create@School
The classroom edition built for lesson plans rather than free play.
Read moreHow we compare
Every tool or course on this page is checked against the same six criteria: the age range it suits, what it costs, its licence, whether it works offline, how it handles data from children, and which languages it supports. We do not add these criteria up into a single score. A tool that suits a wet Tuesday afternoon at home is not the same as one that survives a 45-minute lesson with 25 pupils, so there is no overall winner here, only entries measured against a stated method.
What this does not cover
We have not run formal usability testing, timed benchmarks, or security audits on any entry. Claims about classroom reliability come from the project history on this domain, not from new trials we have run ourselves. Where we have not checked something, the entry says so rather than guessing.
Still early
This comparison is new and small: three tool reviews and two archive pages from the project this domain grew out of. The three are deliberately unalike, a mobile block editor, a browser one, and a full game engine, because the differences between those situations are what the six criteria exist to expose. We would rather publish three honest comparisons than twenty padded ones, so it will grow slowly.